Peer Review Process

Publication of articles in the Ekasakti Educational Journal (EEJ) solely depends on scientific validity and coherence as assessed by our editors and/or peer reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is understandable and whether the work is a useful contribution to the field. Ekasakti Educational Journal (EEJ) acknowledges the efforts and suggestions made by its reviewers.

Preliminary Evaluation of Manuscripts

The editor will first evaluate all submitted manuscripts. Although rare, it deserves to receive an extraordinary manuscript at this stage. Those who are rejected at this stage are not original enough, have serious scientific weaknesses, or are outside the aims and scope of the Ekasakti Educational Journal (EEJ). Those that meet the minimum criteria are forwarded to the reviewer team for review.

Types of Peer Reviews

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientific and reasonable, whether the manuscript is a duplicate of a published work, and whether the manuscript is clear enough to be published. The method is blind peer review.

Review Reports

Reviewers are asked to evaluate about:

validity,
Errors (terms and procedures),
Experimental design,
The methodology used by the reported study,
The significance and significance of the findings,
Originality and implications in the field,
Missing or inaccurate references,
Have results/findings that are presented clearly and support conclusions, and
Follow appropriate ethical guidelines.

Reviewers are not expected to correct or copy manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.

Decision

The reviewer advises the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. Editors will reach decisions based on this report and, if necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor's decision is final.

Become a Reviewer

If you are not currently a reviewer for Ekasakti Educational Journal (EEJ) but would like to be added to the list of reviewers, please contact us. The benefits of reviewing for the Ekasakti Educational Journal (EEJ) include the opportunity to view and evaluate recent work in related research areas at an early stage, and to be recognized in our list of reviewers. You can also cite your work for Ekasakti Educational Journal (EEJ) as part of your professional development requirements.